Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue–Centred Theory of Judging

Solum, L. B. (2003). Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue–Centred Theory of Judging. Metaphilosophy, 34 (1-2): 178-213.

 

Abstract: “Virtue jurisprudence” is a normative and explanatory theory of law that utilises the resources of virtue ethics to answer the central questions of legal theory. The main focus of this essay is the development of a virtue–centred theory of judging. The exposition of the theory begins with exploration of defects in judicial character, such as corruption and incompetence. Next, an account of judicial virtue is introduced. This includes judicial wisdom, a form of phronesis, or sound practical judgement. A virtue–centred account of justice is defended against the argument that theories of fairness are prior to theories of justice. The centrality of virtue as a character trait can be drawn out by analysing the virtue of justice into constituent elements. These include judicial impartiality (even–handed sympathy for those affected by adjudication) and judicial integrity (respect for the law and concern for its coherence). The essay argues that a virtue–centred theory accounts for the role that virtuous practical judgement plays in the application of rules to particular fact situations. Moreover, it contends that a virtue–centred theory of judging can best account for the phenomenon of lawful judicial disagreement. Finally, a virtue–centred approach best accounts for the practice of equity, departure from the rules based on the judge's appreciation of the particular characteristics of individual fact situations.

Source: IngentaConnect

 



(Something interesting I found)Posted: Monday, January 12, 2009 by admin
Filed under: , ,
Join the Network    
Users are able to post news & publications, maintain a profile, and participate in discussion forums related to research on virtues.