Bad Drives Psychological Reactions, but Good Propels Behavior: Responses to Honesty and Deception
Wang, C. S., Galinsky, A. D., Murnighan, J. K. (2009). Bad Drives Psychological Reactions, but Good Propels Behavior: Responses to Honesty and Deception. Psychological Science, 20 (5): 634-44.
Abstract: Research across disciplines suggests
that bad is stronger than good and that individuals punish deception
more than they reward honesty. However, methodological issues in
previous research limit the latter conclusion. Three experiments
resolved these issues and consistently found the opposite pattern:
Individuals rewarded honesty more frequently and intensely than they
punished deception. Experiment 2
extended these counterintuitive findings by revealing a divergence
between evaluation and behavior: Evaluative reactions to deception were
stronger than those to honesty, but behavioral intentions in response
to honesty were stronger than those in response to deception. In
addition, individuals wanted to avoid deceivers more than they wanted
to approach honest actors. Experiment 3
found that punishment, but not reward, frequencies were sensitive to
costs. Moderated-mediation tests revealed the role of different
psychological mechanisms: Negative affect drove punishments, whereas
perceived trustworthiness drove rewards. Overall, bad appears to be
stronger than good in influencing psychological reactions, but good
seems to be stronger than bad in influencing behavior.
Source: Wiley InterScience
Image from Flickr Creative Commons.
(Something interesting I found)Posted: Tuesday, June 23, 2009
by
admin
-
Pingback from My Serial Deceptionist | America's Next Top Novel