Is Moral Theory Harmful in Practice?—Relocating Anti-theory in Contemporary Ethics
Ethical Theory and Practice, Vol. 12, No. 5, 539-553.
In this paper I discuss the viability of the claim that at least some forms of moral theory are harmful for sound moral thought
and practice. This claim was put forward by e.g. Elisabeth Anscombe (1981(1958))
and by Annette Baier, Peter Winch, D.Z Phillips and Bernard Williams in
the 1970’s–1980’s. To this day aspects of it have found resonance in
both post-Wittgensteinian and virtue ethical quarters. The criticism
has on one hand contributed to a substantial change and broadening of
the scope of analytic moral philosophy. On the other hand it is, at
least in its most strongly anti-theoretical formulations, now broadly
considered outdated and—to the extent that it is still
defended—insensitive to the changes that have occurred within the field
in the last 20–30 years. The task of this paper is to relocate the
anti-theoretical critique into the field of analytic ethics today.
Read the article.
(Something interesting I found)Posted: Friday, January 15, 2010