Perceptions of Nano Ethics among Practitioners in a Developing Country: A Case of India
NanoEthics, Volume 4, Number 1
By Debasmita Patra, E. Haribabu and Katherine A. McComas
Many developing countries have allocated significant amounts of funding
for nanoscience and nanotechnology research, yet compared to developed
countries, there has been little study, discussion, or debate over
social and ethical issues. Using in-depth interviews, this study
focuses on the perceptions of practitioners, that is, scientists and
engineers, in one developing country: India. The disciplinary
background, departmental affiliation, types of institutions, age, and
sex of the practitioners varied but did not appear to affect their
responses. The results show that 95% of the Indian practitioners
working in the area of nanoscience and nanotechnology research
recognized ethical issues in this research area, and 60% of them could
offer specific examples, which included possible ill effects on
environment and human, use as a weapon, hype, professional ethics,
laboratory testing on animals, cyborgs, widening the gap between rich
and poor, self-replication, and longevity of human life. The results
may offer opportunities for future cross-cultural research, as well as
offer examples that can be used to raise the awareness of other
practitioners in India and elsewhere regarding the importance of
ethical issues.
Read the article.
(Something interesting I found)Posted: Tuesday, May 11, 2010
by
cait